Skip to content

Communication

April 2, 2015

2015PoetryMonthRecently I reread a poem by Richard Cecil entitled “Communication,” and my perspective had changed enough for me to understand it. I think it’s not so much about the desire to be forgiven for what we haven’t said as it is about how private feelings and thoughts can keep us from being able to talk to each other.

The categories of indulgences, in the poem, are like the expected things people can say about big topics–love and death, the existence of god, who believes in ghosts. Calling to the kitties is like the unexpected way a person sometimes reacts—an elderly cat is no longer on your bed at bedtime and one night his absence makes you remember something you should have said to your elderly mother years ago.

Communication

Thank god for cell phones! Now I can talk
while walking by myself but not draw stares
from people passing by me on the street,
since one of every two or three lone walkers
shouts to an invisible companion.
But still I keep my voice down when I say,
“Sweet Kitties!” to my absent cats, now dead—
a habit I took up when they moved in
twenty years ago and started acting
so cute all day and night that I praised them
even when they weren’t there to listen.
“Pretty kitties, darling kitty cats,”
I whisper like the Pope’s ejaculations,
which have indulgences attached to them:
“Blessed Virgin Mary Pray for Us,”
“Lord Have Mercy on My Sins,” etc.
Each repetition cuts the sinner’s sentence
by fifty days or so in Purgatory.
Once in fifth grade I logged a hundred years
of time off my to-be-determined sentence.
But constant praying drowned out all my thoughts,
and so I bombed the quiz in long division
and got a sixty on the spelling test.
And, besides, all of my sins were Mortal,
which meant I’d spend eternity in Hell,
“from which there is no possible reprieve,”
according to the Catholic Catechism.
Forever minus a century’s forever—
that’s the math I fully understood.
What I needed was a Plenary Indulgence,
the kind that popes sold in the middle ages,
where the buyer’s soul is cleansed of all its sins
and its sentence to be roasted is commuted.
But since the Reformation you can’t buy those;
in modern times the only way to earn
a Plenary Indulgence is martyrdom.
So I stopped muttering ejaculations
except for cheers and curses—“Holy Shit!”
But still I couldn’t seem to keep my mouth shut.
I had to talk, if only to myself,
which got me into trouble in the classroom
until I got promoted to professor,
where doing all the talking is encouraged
by students who refuse to raise their hands—
though they’re the ones who, filing out of class,
instantly dial up their friends to chat
on their way to the dining hall or dorm.
I let them get two steps ahead, then call
out to my absent cats—“Oh, you darlings”—
the way I used to when they waited for me,
listening for my footsteps on the porch.
Now they’re somewhere I can only reach
By talking to myself. “Sweet kitty cats”
Reconjures them for me just for a second:
hungry and meowing by the door,
knowing that I’m coming home to feed them.
“What would you kitties like to eat for supper?”
I whisper as I pass a girl who’s weeping
into her cell phone. The kitties say, “Thin air.”

The professor’s call after a few of the young people who have been tongue-tied in class—“Oh, you darlings”—is to the memory of the cats, but also, obliquely, to the young people, who only show him their tears in another context. They can be moved. They are moved by the professor’s attempts to feed their hunger to know more, but he can’t find a way to reach them except by talking to himself, and the act of talking to himself makes him ridiculous.

We see a young girl weeping into her cell phone and we think we know the story. We see an old man talking to himself, and we’re almost sure of it. And yet, how much more could we learn with a little more time for observation, a little more interest in what pulls the individuals we meet to observe the routines and rituals that shape their lives?

Advertisements
7 Comments leave one →
  1. April 2, 2015 12:48 pm

    I think you make some interesting points here. There is the surface of the communication the professor is doing — saying things to the ghosts of cats — but also to those around him/her that she/he would love to say, but for whatever reason is prevented from doing so to the object of those statements. Only able to say those statements to himself/herself, making him/her ridiculous.

    • April 5, 2015 3:02 pm

      Sometimes students want to hear more than the “expected things,” but then they have to learn how to look beneath the surface for the truth.

  2. parrish lantern permalink
    April 3, 2015 8:45 am

    Language ~ Shachar Mario Mordechai

    I am snared in the language trap
    between strong emotion and a lazy tongue
    I awaken, toss and turn and fall asleep
    besieged by the body, a slip of the tongue.                          
     
    Now I say: sea. And can’t contain it.
    I say: sky. Is that where His armyand all His soldiers are?
    Oh no no no. I meant something else.
    But I repeat the words. As I do now. Here:
     
    I am snared in the language trap
    between strong emotion and a lazy tongue
    again I awaken, toss and turn and fall asleep
    besieged by the body, the silliness of the tongue.

    But asleep and awake I’ll knock on your door
    until you open it. Open up, open up.
    You’ll hear the wordless
    tap tap tap,
    I’m here and won’t leave until you open
    and greet me and my lips part.

    And even if my face were stone
    and my eyes a rising river
    as in the Valley of Giants or the Valley of Tears;
    if my voice were a high groan
    contriving to crack,
    the day will come, and with it wellbeing.
    Because this is between you and me:
     
    There is speech made of silence.
    An obstacle may be a path. 
    There is hunger that can’t be sated,
    desire that can’t be starved.
    There are disagreements (after agreements are signed).
    A hunger in the heart, ticking, that doesn’t give up.
    Clouds that make their way
    to a stormy winter. There is spring, a cure.
    There is a watchman on my path among the passersby,
    a lit pathway from the shoreline to the stars.
     
    Here I said: sea. Skies and soldiers.
    I can contain them.
    Because I desire you and many suns,
    and many waters
    cannot quench this.
    Let me be a seal upon your heart.

     Trans: Lisa Katz

    • April 5, 2015 3:03 pm

      Answering a poem with another poem is kind of like answering a question with another question, isn’t it?

      • parrish lantern permalink
        April 5, 2015 4:31 pm

        Isn’t quite often the nature of poetry that it poses questions or as Carl Sandbag said “Poetry is the journal
        of the sea animal living on land, wanting to fly in the air. Poetry
        is a search for syllables to shoot at the barriers of the unknown and the unknowable. Poetry is a phantom script
        telling how rainbows are made and why they go away.

  3. April 17, 2015 1:22 pm

    I love the effect of poetry, don’t you?

    • April 17, 2015 1:31 pm

      I like it that it has an emotional effect, and I don’t always have to figure out exactly what each word contributes to the feeling it gives me.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: